💬 Request a Quote, It's FREE!!!

SPS4065: An understanding of the research process and the appropriate terminology (LO1). An understanding of different research methodologies and basic quantitative and qualitative data analysis techniques

SPS4065 Introduction to Research Assignment Brief Semester 1, 2026 | St Mary's University, Twickenham, London

SPS4065 Introduction to Research Assignment Brief

Core Learning Outcomes:

Knowledge and Understanding

1. An understanding of the research process and the appropriate terminology (LO1)

Cognitive Skills

2. An understanding of different research methodologies and basic quantitative and qualitative data analysis techniques (LO2)

Performance and Practice

3. The ability to use SPSS for basic descriptive and inferential statistical analysis (LO3)
4. Skills in data presentation and referencing procedures (LO4)

Personal and Enabling Skills

5. The ability to use IT and communicate effectively in writing (LO5)

6. The ability to work in a group and reflect on assessment feedback in the context of student reviews (LO6)

Assessment Guidance on Research Portfolio SPS4065

Submit your research portfolio following the Harvard Referencing Style formatting guidelines(presentation and referencing) – Please check your Canvas resources for this. Submissions should be in an electronic version (PDF) to TurnItIn on the SPS4065 Canvas Page. 

The following information on each section of the research portfolio is suggestive toprovide general format guidance. Failure to meet the final portfolio deadline will result in a fail for the module.

Part 1: Literature Review (20 marks – 500 words ± 10% word count)

  • Select one of the research questions (either a Sports Science, Coaching, or Nutrition research question) provided to you.
  • Write a short review of the literature to give the background to your research question, indicating its relevance and importance
  • This section should consist of a well-organised and succinct review of key literature on this topic (‘what we know’)
  • It should be an insightful analysis of previous research studies in your chosen area, and in doing so builds a rationale (‘what we don’t know’) for examining the given research question
  • Include at least 10 references in your literature review, and include the reference list at the end of your review
  • In-text citations (references) will be included in the word count. References in the reference list will not be included in the word count.

Part 2: Research Design Short Answer (20 marks - Up to 250 words per question; 5marks per question)

  • This section will examine your knowledge and understanding of research design and methods
  • Utilising information from the recorded lectures and seminars, you will answer fourshort answer questions on research design
  • These short answer questions will be specifically linked to your weekly seminars, soplease ensure you make each session
  • Include references and academic literature to support your answers
  • (the word limit for each question is up to 250 words – anything over this will not be marked).

Part 3: Quantitative Analysis Task (20 marks - 350 words ± 10% word count)

  • You will be given a quantitative data set in SPSS to analyse
  • Conduct the appropriate analysis and annotate key findings from the SPSS outputs
  • Present findings clearly and logically in the text and figures
  • Report preliminary analysis checks
  • Details of statistical results must be given (i.e., whether the results were significant or not, and if significant, give the level of significance), using appropriate statistical language
  • In addition to the text, produce a figure to display the main findings
  • All figures must be properly labelled and have a title (in line with Harvard Referencing Guidelines).

Part 4: Qualitative Analysis Task (20 marks – 600 words ± 10% word count)

  • For this part of the assessment, you will select one of the research topics from Part 1of the Research Portfolio and create a semi-structured interview guide (you don't have to select the same topic as you did for the literature review)
  • You will then be given an interview transcript for your chosen research topic to conduct some preliminary data analysis
  • Include your interview guide, interview transcript and preliminary analysis in your submission
  • 5 marks will be allocated to the interview guide; 15 marks will be allocated towards the analysis of the interview transcript
  • No references are required in this section.

Part 5: Infographic Section (20 marks – 600 words ± 10% word count)

  • Design an engaging and informative 1-page infographic to convey what should appear in a research paper discussion
  • Communicate your ideas to a non-academic audience
  • Use images and text to engage your audience
  • You can use whichever software you wish to create your infographic, but one of the easiest ways is through PowerPoint.
  • Here is a guidance video to help:

Enterprise Data Protection Included with Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat

SPS4065 Assessment

References 

  • Present in Harvard Referencing Style format
  • Check that all references quoted in the text from sections 1-5 are included in onecomplete reference list at the end of your portfolio
  • Failing to include references that appear in sections 1-5 will result in marks being deducted from the sections in question.

Marking Guidance 

Part 1: Literature Review (20 marks)

CriterionMarks available
Opening paragraph 
General overview and background of the review topic, setting the scene related to the title3
Literature10
Literature is organised well into themes2
Insightful, succinct analysis of sources3
Builds a clear narrative3
Use of 10 (minimum) appropriate sources2
Summary 
A clear section that summarises the main points of the review2
Referencing, spelling and grammar 
Scientific writing style, Harvard formatted referencing5

Part 2: Research Design Short Answer (5 marks per question)

MarksGuidance
5 marksExcellent knowledge and understanding demonstrated, literature to support their answer, utilise examples from the lectures/seminars, excellent written and reference presentation
4 marksAll of the above, but without examples from the lecture/seminar
3 marksGood understanding shown, but opportunities throughout to provide more clarity, examples, and literature
2 marksEngagement with the question but some misunderstanding is apparent, and no literature to support their answer
1 markMinimal attempt to answer each question
0 marksNo attempt/incorrect

Part 3: Quantitative (20 marks)

CriterionMarks available
SPSS screenshots 
Annotated screenshots illustrating descriptive statistics, normality and statistical test outcomes7
APA formatted Figure6
Appropriate figure selection1
Correct title place & wording1
Correct axis labels + units1
Correct formatting – no colour, lines, legend etc.1
Correct values1
Correct use and formatting of error bars; Inclusion of * on figures (if appropriate)1
Summary statement 
Clear statement of key findings5
Accurate test statistic and p-value2

Part 4: Qualitative (20 marks)

CriterionMarks available
Interview Guide5
Questions are relevant to the chosen research question 
Open and probing questions are included 
Logical flow to the interview guide 
Initial Coding10
Clear engagement with the coding process 
Appropriate initial codes assigned to the raw data extracts 
Depth and clarity - is the data contextualised 
Data organisation5
Attempts to synthesise the initial coding (either in the form of an Excel or Word table) 
Grouping of common codes 
Collapsing codes into themes 

Part 5: Infographic (20 marks) 

CriterionMarks available
Content 
Key aspects of a research paper discussion are included5
Includes a description of each section’s purpose5
The language is appropriate for a non-academic audience3
Design 
Visually appealing and engaging infographic4
Appropriate balance between text and visual information3

 

SPS4065Introduction to Research   
Assessment itemLearning Outcomes AssessedDue DateWeight 
15 independent tasksLO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5, LO65th of May 2026, Before 5pm100%
Resubmissions – 2nd Attempt    
(for students who did not pass their first attempt)13th of November 2026   
Date Feedback and Grade will be available (2nd Attempts):Two Weeks Post Due Date   
 NB. Assessment grades are not final until the University Examination Board takes place   
Resubmissions – 3rd Attempt (Final Opportunity)

Next Academic Year – Date TBC   
(for students who did not pass their 2nd attempt) 
WhatsApp