Imagine a scenario of a company selling confidential consumer data from wearable fitness-tracking devices to health insurance companies. The regulatory agencies

Though technology, in its increasing ubiquity, largely serves to simplify and make more convenient many daily processes, the extent to which people use and are reliant on technology means that the potential for a vulnerable attack is also heightened. Health care technology has made massive strides in improving quality patient care, making telehealth more accessible to the masses, and cutting down on unnecessary costs. But the more data are digitized, the greater the probability of a breach.

Imagine a scenario of a company selling confidential consumer data from wearable fitness-tracking devices to health insurance companies. The regulatory agencies have determined that critical questions about corporate responsibility and the ethical implications of health information technology (HIT) may have been violated. At the corporate level, the incident underscores the need for robust governance mechanisms to ensure the protection of sensitive health data.

Ethically, this situation prompts a discussion on the principles guiding health information technology. The very purpose of wearable fitness-tracking devices is to empower individuals to monitor and manage their health. However, when the data collected is exploited for financial gains, ethical concerns arise. The unauthorized sale of consumer data violates these principles and raises questions about the accountability of technology companies in safeguarding the privacy of individuals.

This incident highlights the ethical dilemmas that arise as health care technology becomes more integrated into people’s lives. The interplay between technology, corporate interests, and individual privacy protected by HIPAA, requires a comprehensive examination of governance structures and ethical frameworks. It also underscores the importance of ongoing dialogue and updates to policies and regulations to keep pace with the evolving landscape of health information technology.

In a paper of 500–750 words, address the following points:

1. How is this scenario an example of an ethics breach? Discuss the ethics of health care information technology use, patient protections, and governance regulation requirements.
2. What governance consequences at corporate, local, state, and federal levels might the companies face as a result of this breach?
3. Moving forward, what changes would the health insurance company need to implement in order to ensure that their communication with customers and corporations is respectful and confidential to ensure ongoing compliance with HIPAA?
4. How will a renewed commitment by the companies to honor the confidentiality of customer information serve to promote the common good? How is ethical decision-making within a business setting consistent with the Christian worldview (CWV)?