7001GHM Assessment Checklist: Leadership within Healthcare Systems
This checklist is designed to help you self-evaluate your coursework submission against the module learning outcomes, and CMI Level 7 requirements before final submission. Note that this DOES NOT REPLACE the assessment guidelines.
|
• PARTS |
YES |
NO |
|
PARTS 1: 1500-word Critical Analysis INTRODUCTION • Clear organizational structure and demography of xyz healthcare.
MAIN BODY:
• Critically explores burnout and reduced team effectiveness using statistic/data and tools (if relevant) • Addresses xyz organisational effectiveness and performance. • Use of leadership theories and models relevant to healthcare and application of systems thinking. • Critical analysis of its effect on organisational culture, health and wellbeing. • Consideration of leadership impact on workforce wellbeing • Identification of performance and quality improvement challenges • Evidence-based improvement strategies proposed • Addresses Module Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4 |
|
|
|
Part 2: 15-minute Presentation with 500-word Speaker Notes • Introduction slide included • Critical exploration of potential causes • Application of tools and techniques from the module • Implementation of Proposed leadership and development strategy (from PART 1) • Concluding critical reflection on organisational issues |
|
|
|
• Maximum of 11 slides • Audio or video narration included. • Speaker notes included after the 11 slides. • Addresses Module Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 5
|
|
|
|
Part 3: 500-word Personal Development Plan (PDP)
• Use of self-assessment or diagnostic tools to demonstrate awareness of personal leadership style • Critical reflection on own leadership strengths and development (using reflection models if relevant) and mapped against professional codes (CMI COP and professional code of conduct if relevant) • Short and long-term goals clearly defined (SMART, PACT or equivalent) represented in a tabular format in the body of your essay. (NOT in the appendix please) • Actions for achieving identified goals including evaluating methods for progress (Relevant tools applied). • Addresses Module Learning Outcomes 1, 5 |
|
|
General Requirements and Final Pre submission Check
• Uses critical analysis throughout (not descriptive)
• Recording and Word counts within limits (+or- 10% respectively)
• Use of academic literature and CMI resources in alignment with postgraduate and CMI Level 7 expectations.
• Appropriate intext citation and academic referencing
• Single CU APA reference list for entire coursework
• Appendices used appropriately and Use of AI declared (refer to guideline)
• Professional presentation and formatting
• Composite submission in A4 landscape setting PowerPoint file
• Submission is NOT in PDF
Have I addressed the Assessment Marking Criteria? What is my proposed grade band?
|
Mark Bands |
Module LO1: Critical Exploration of Leadership Theories and Characteris tics of Effective Healthcare Leaders |
Module LO2: Analysis of Systems Thinking in Health Systems |
Module LO3: Evaluation of Challenges and Effectivene ss in Leading Quality Improveme nts |
Module LO4: Examinatio n of Organisatio nal Culture, Health, and Wellbeing in Leadership |
Module LO5: Applicatio n of Tools and Technique s for Self- Developm ent in Leadershi p |
Written and Verbal Presentation , Communicat ion, and Design |
|
Outstand ing (80- 100%) |
Demonstrat es exceptional critical analysis of leadership theories, leadership styles and impact, effectively identifying characteristi cs of highly effective and strategic healthcare leaders. Exceptional use of evidence and theory. |
Provides an outstanding critical analysis of systems thinking in health systems, demonstrat ing deep understandi ng and strong theoretical integration. |
Demonstrat es exceptional evaluation of challenges, effectivenes s, and impact in leading quality improveme nts within health systems. Strong critical depth. |
Provides exceptional analysis of organisation al culture, health and wellbeing and their impact on leadership demonstrati ng deep insights into health and wellbeing strategies. |
Exceptiona lly applies diverse tools and techniques for self- awareness and self- developme nt, reflecting critically on leadership growth with strong evidence and application . |
Exceptionally clear, professional, creative and engaging written and verbal presentation. Outstanding use of visuals, structure, and academic tone. Timing and delivery of the verbal presentation are impeccable. Excellent use of relevant references |
|
Excellent (70-79%) |
Provides a thorough critical analysis of leadership theories and styles, with strong discussion of effective healthcare leaders. Wellsupported |
Offers a comprehen sive analysis of systems thinking within health systems, showing strong theoretical connections and |
Provides a strong evaluation of leadership challenges and quality improveme nts, with some insightful discussions. |
Presents a strong discussion of organisation al culture, health, and wellbeing, supported by relevant evidence and theoretical insights. |
Applies a variety of self- awareness and self- developme nt tools and techniques with strong critical reflection on their |
Clear, creative and professional written and verbal presentation with strong visuals and structure, as appropriate. Timing and delivery of the verbal presentation |
|
|
by evidence and theory. |
evidencebased discussion. |
|
|
impact on leadership developme nt. |
are effective. Very good use of relevant references. |
|
Very Good (60-69%) |
Offers a solid discussion of leadership theories, styles and characteristi cs of effective healthcare leaders. Some minor gaps in integrating evidence and theory. |
Provides a very good analysis of systems thinking, with relevant examples and discussion, though some areas lack depth. |
Evaluates leadership challenges and quality improveme nts with relevant evidence, but critical depth may be inconsistent . |
Discusses organisation al culture including health and wellbeing in leadership with very good insight and some strategies but may lack critical engagement in certain areas. |
Applies self- awareness and self- developme nt tools and techniques but with some gaps in critical reflection and leadership application . |
Very good written and verbal presentation style and structure. Some minor issues with visuals, tone, or timing, as appropriate. Good use of relevant references. |
|
Good (50-59%) |
Provides a good discussion of leadership theories and styles, though critical depth is limited. Some relevant examples used. |
Discusses systems thinking in health systems but lacks depth or may rely on descriptive rather than analytical points. |
Presents a good evaluation of leadership challenges and quality improveme nts. Discussion is present but lacks strong critical engagement . |
Provides a good discussion of organisation al culture and health and wellbeing. Some important areas may be underexplor ed. |
Uses self- developme nt tools but lacks critical reflection on their application to leadership growth. |
Good written and verbal presentation with noticeable errors in visuals, structure, or timing. Engagement may be inconsistent. Good use of relevant references. |
|
Pass (4049%) |
Offers a minimal discussion of leadership theories and styles with limited critical engagement. |
Provides a superficial analysis of systems thinking. Some points are relevant but lack clear theoretical |
Offers a limited evaluation of leadership challenges and quality improveme nts. Evidence |
Discusses organisation al culture and health briefly, but the discussion is superficial and lacks strong |
Demonstra tes minimal application of self- developme nt tools, with little reflection on |
Basic written presentation with significant issues in visuals, tone, or structure. Timing may be off. Minimal use |
|
|
Lacks depth in analysis and supporting evidence. |
connections . |
may be weak or inconsistent ly applied. |
supporting evidence. |
leadership impact. |
of relevant references. |
|
Fail (0- 39%) |
Fails to critically explore leadership theories and styles or identify key characteristi cs of effective healthcare leaders. Discussion is vague or unsupporte d by evidence. |
Fails to demonstrat e an understandi ng of systems thinking in health systems. Analysis is weak or absent. |
Fails to evaluate leadership challenges and quality improveme nts. Discussion may be missing, unclear, or unsupporte d by evidence. |
Fails to discuss organisation al culture including health and well-being and their role in leadership. Evidence and theoretical connections are absent or insufficient. |
Lacks application of self- developme nt tools and techniques, with no meaningful reflection on leadership developme nt. |
Poorly structured and unclear presentation. Visuals and timing are inadequate. Engagement is minimal or absent. References not included. |