BSM22001 Academic Development – Critical Thinking and Research

ByJamez

BSM22001 Academic Development – Critical Thinking and Research

Project Title

Final Project

Deadlines

Group Debate:

Group Presentation

Project Portfolio: Essay Portfolio

Submission Method

Portfolio: Online (.pptx, .docx or .PDF submission via Turn-It-In, refer to Canvas for submission link)

Project Staff

 

Module Title

Academic Development – Critical Thinking and Research

Level / Semester

L3 Semester 1 (Sept 2024)

Module Code

BSM22001

Credit / Weighting

20

Module Leader

 

Date of Issue

11/09/2024

Project Brief

Project Overview:

The importance of critical thinking will equip you to think deeply about issues that are key to not only your subject matter but to the wider society and beyond. This module will enable and prepare you to make reasoned decisions about your subject discipline based on evidence and research rather than assumption.

Over the next 12 weeks, you will take part in a number of class activities (details to be provided by your tutor). These activities include:

  • In-class debates 20%
  • Research activities 60%
  • In-class presentations 20%
  • Essay writing skill development tutorial
  • Critical thinking activities
  • Activities to learn how to form arguments and analyse information
  • Activities to learn how to arrive at valid solutions

Project Description:

Produce a portfolio of the research you carried out for the items in bold above and reflect on the contributions you made. Your portfolio (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4) should include the following:

Cover Page

Please use the Business Management cover page. Please read the course statement on AI use.

1. Introduction (max 100 words) 5%

Outline the contents of the portfolio and the activities that you will be reflecting on.

2. Class Activity One (your choice of activity) – (max 300 words) 10%

What was the activity? How did you contribute? What research did you carry out? How did that research help you to think critically?

3. Class Activity Two (your choice of activity) – (max 300 word) 10%

What was the activity? How did you contribute? What research did you carry out? How did that research help you to think critically?

4.  Class Activity Three (your choice of activity) – (max 300 words) 10%

What was the activity? How did you contribute? What research did you carry out? How did that research help you to think critically?

5. Self-reflection Essay 25%

Offer a 1000-word reflection (essay format) on the content of the above activities, including a conclusion with focus on the critical thinking skills you used or needed to explore and contribute to each. Use Gibb’s model of self-reflection for this.

6. Reference List

Please use Harvard referencing.

Additional Information:

  • Submit the assignment in MS Word or PDF format. Use 12-point font, Times New Roman or Arial (on an off-white/ cream background).
  • Pre-scan for plagiarism via Turnitin software is required
  • Submission deadline is
  • Debate 11/12/2024
  • Research Activities(Essay) 10/02/2025

Essential Reading List –- Harvard referenced

 

Atkinson, I. (2014). The creative problem solver: 12 smart tools to solve any business challenge. Harlow, England; New York: Pearson.

HBR’s 10 must reads on innovation. (2013). Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.

Christensen, C.M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business Review Press.

Ogden, J. (2019). Thinking critically about research: a step-by-step approach. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge. Wilson, J. (2022). Understanding research for business students: a complete student’s guide. Los Angeles Sage.

Ridley, M. (2021). How innovation works: and why it flourishes in freedom. New York: Harper Perennial. Rutherford A., (2021) How to Think Critically. ARB Publications.

 

 

 

Assessment and tutor feedback date

Student will receive feedback and assessment in accordance with deadlines subject to the registry timetable, from 20 working days after submission.

Students who miss the deadline or fail this project may be required to complete a retrieval project which demonstrates that the learning outcomes have been achieved. Students should be aware that retrieval submissions are capped at a bare pass grade, unless the extenuating circumstances panel uphold an evidenced application. The deadline for retrieval submissions will be determined at an Assessment Board.

Module Learning Outcomes

LO1

Explain claims, inferences, arguments through critical thinking and reflection

LO2

 

Consider a range research methodologies and literature

LO3

 

Evidence written and verbal academic ability and integrity

LO4

 

Communicate relevant and coherent arguments clearly and accurately in a concise and logical manner

Similar Posts