Analyze the student work produced from your formative assessment using the Student Achievement Partners (green sheet) Student Work Analysis sheet for either ELA Download ELAor

Analytic Summary Assignment:

1. Analyze the student work produced from your formative assessment using the Student Achievement Partners (green sheet) Student Work Analysis sheet for either ELA Download ELAor Math Download Math.

2. After you have analyzed the student work samples, post the score/results from the students performance to the post-assessment of the Student Achievement Chart (SAC),. Download post-assessment of the Student Achievement Chart (SAC),. and complete the reflection questions at the bottom of the SAC.

Include the Student Achievement Partners Student Work Analysis (elementary sample) Download (elementary sample)(secondary sample) Download (secondary sample)and the SAC with a final copy of your Formative Assessment in your final submission with the Analytic Summary – All due in Module 12.

Then, using this analysis, submit an Analytic Summary of the effectiveness of your formative assessment:

Submit an Analytic Summary following this 4 question outline:

What evidence of progression toward ongoing content mastery or near mastery does your assessment provide (be sure to cite your work using the readings from the course)?

How do the results of your assessment offer a clear picture of the student’s progress toward mastery of the Learning Targets? What do they know/understand? What would you need to reteach? Give 3 examples.
What did you learn about creating formative assessments from this project? Cite at least 3 important insights.
Provide 3 specific examples of the actual changes you would make by showing the original question and next to it the revised question based upon the outcome of the student work, and justify with the research why those changes would be appropriate.
Submission of the Analytic Summary Assignment Must Include All Project Components:

1) Analytical Summary (inc: completed Student Achievement Partners Student Work Analysis sheets with student work samples)

2) Formative Assessment (inc: preassessment, SAC, instructional materials, rubrics).

SEE RUBRIC IN MODULE 12 AND USE IT AS A WRITER’S CHECKLIST!

Note: When discussing your instructional methods, data collection strategies back-up your instructional moves up with research. Use the sources from this course and outside sources. Know why you are doing what you are doing and why it works.

For example:

Bill was level 2 during the preassessment because he scored 6/10 problems. During the lesson we reviewed our regrouping strategies and a 10-frame. During the assessment Bill’s ability to regroup improved and he scored 9/10 problems correct. When asked about what strategy he chose, Bill said “well, I really like bears so I used the Teddy bear counters and it worked.”
- - Eventually when you complete the Touro Culminating Achievements Portfolio (TCAP) – you will need to be able to provide appropriate evidence from your work and demonstrate how you mastered the standards by providing evidence as modeled above.

Rubric

Final Assignment-Analytic Summary – 12-20-24

Final Assignment-Analytic Summary – 12-20-24
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion #1 How do the results of your revised test offer a clear picture of the test-takers’ mastery of the Learning Targets? What do they know and understand? What would you need to reteach? Give 3 examples	4 pts Level 4 Response demonstrates clear and measurable data/evidence of how your assessments (pre-formative-summative) construction and results show and support the student’s mastery of Learning Targets AND need for further instruction. 3 specific examples are included, and instructional decision-making and next steps are supported by research from the course readings and other sources. 2.55 pts Level 3 Response demonstrates some measurable data/evidence of how your assessments (pre-formative-summative) construction and results show and support the student’s mastery of Learning Targets AND/OR need for further instruction. 2 specific examples are included, AND/OR instructional decision-making AND/OR next steps are supported by research from the course readings and other sources. 2.25 pts Level 2 Response demonstrates insufficient measurable data/evidence of how your assessments (pre-formative-summative) construction and results show and support the student’s mastery of Learning Targets AND/OR need for further instruction. 1 specific examples are included, OR instructional decision-making AND/OR next steps are NOT supported by research from the course readings and other sources. 1.51 pts Level 1 Missing 3 or more criteria as described in Level 1.	4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion #2 What did you learn about creating formative assessments from this project? Cite at least 3 important insights.	3 pts Level 4 Response provides 3 or more data-based and research-based pieces of evidence of their personal understanding/growth about assessment and provides clear and thorough explanations of 3 or more important insights. 2.55 pts Level 3 Response provides 2 data-based and research-based pieces of evidence of their personal understanding/growth about assessment and provides clear and thorough explanations of 2 important insights. 2.25 pts Level 2 Response gives insufficient evidence of learning or explanations of >2 important insights are not clear. Response does NOT provide >2 data-based and research-based pieces of evidence of their personal understanding/growth about assessment and does NOT provide clear and thorough explanations of >2 or more important insights. 1.5 pts Level 1 Missing 3 or more criteria as described in Level 1.	3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion #3- Analytic Summary Assignment: Entire project components, timeliness, mechanics. Must Include All: 1) Analytical Summary (inc: completed Student Achievement Partners Student Work Analysis sheets with student work samples) 2) Formative Assessment (inc: preassessment, SAC, instructional materials, rubrics) Timeliness of all work submitted.	3 pts Level 4 On time and contains Both 1 & 2 and ALL descriptor components. 2.63 pts Level 3 24 hours late contains Both 1 & 2 and/or missing one descriptor components 2.25 pts Level 2 48hrs late contains Both 1 & 2 and/or missing 2 descriptor components 1.5 pts Level 1 More than 48 hours late and/or missing 1 or 2 and/or 3 or more descriptor components	3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion #4 Provide 3 specific examples of the actual changes you would make by showing the original question and next to it the revised question based upon the outcome of the student work, and justify with the research why those changes would be appropriate.	4 pts Level 4 Response provides 3 or more examples of the actual changes you would make by showing the original question and next the revised question based upon the outcome of the student work and justify with research why those changes would be appropriate. 3.4 pts Level 3 Response provides 2 examples of the actual changes you would make by showing the original question and next the revised question based upon the outcome of the student work and/or justify with research why those changes would be appropriate. 3 pts Level 2 Response provides 1 examples of the actual changes you would make by showing the original question and next the revised question based upon the outcome of the student work and/or justify with research why those changes would be appropriate. 2 pts Level 1 Missing 2 or more criteria as described in Level 2.	4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion 5: APA, Grammar and Spelling	2 pts Level 4 0-2 errors in spelling and/or grammar and APA citations were always used when needed 1.76 pts Level 3 3-4 errors in spelling and/or grammar or APA citations were used to back up most points 1.5 pts Level 2 5-6 errors in spelling and/or grammar citations were used but were not in APA format 1 pts Level 1 6+ errors citations or were not used	2 pts

Final
Assignment-Analytic Summary – 12-20-24

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion #1

How do the results of your revised test offer a clear
picture of the test-takers’ mastery of the Learning Targets?
What do they know and understand?
What would you need to reteach?
Give 3 examples

4 pts

Level 4

Response demonstrates clear and measurable data/evidence
of how your assessments (pre-formative-summative) construction and results
show and support the student’s mastery of Learning Targets AND need for
further instruction. 3 specific examples are included, and instructional
decision-making and next steps are supported by research from the course
readings and other sources.

2.55 pts

Level 3

Response demonstrates some measurable data/evidence of how
your assessments (pre-formative-summative) construction and results show and
support the student’s mastery of Learning Targets AND/OR need for further
instruction. 2 specific examples are included, AND/OR instructional
decision-making AND/OR next steps are supported by research from the course
readings and other sources.

2.25 pts

Level 2

Response demonstrates insufficient measurable
data/evidence of how your assessments (pre-formative-summative) construction
and results show and support the student’s mastery of Learning Targets AND/OR
need for further instruction. 1 specific examples are included, OR
instructional decision-making AND/OR next steps are NOT supported by research
from the course readings and other sources.

1.51 pts

Level 1

Missing 3 or more criteria as described in Level 1.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion #2

What did you learn about creating formative assessments
from this project? Cite at least 3 important insights.

3 pts

Level 4

Response provides 3 or more data-based and research-based
pieces of evidence of their personal understanding/growth about assessment
and provides clear and thorough explanations of 3 or more important insights.

2.55 pts

Level 3

Response provides 2 data-based and research-based pieces
of evidence of their personal understanding/growth about assessment and
provides clear and thorough explanations of 2 important insights.

2.25 pts

Level 2

Response gives insufficient evidence of learning or
explanations of >2 important insights are not clear. Response does NOT
provide >2 data-based and research-based pieces of evidence of their
personal understanding/growth about assessment and does NOT provide clear and
thorough explanations of >2 or more important insights.

1.5 pts

Level 1

Missing 3 or more criteria as described in Level 1.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion
#3- Analytic Summary Assignment: Entire project components, timeliness,
mechanics.

Must Include All:
1) Analytical Summary (inc: completed Student Achievement Partners Student
Work Analysis sheets with student work samples)

2) Formative Assessment (inc: preassessment, SAC, instructional materials,
rubrics)
Timeliness of all work submitted.

3 pts

Level 4

On time and contains Both 1 & 2 and ALL descriptor
components.

2.63 pts

Level 3

24 hours late contains Both 1 & 2 and/or missing one
descriptor components

2.25 pts

Level 2

48hrs late contains Both 1 & 2 and/or missing 2
descriptor components

1.5 pts

Level 1

More than 48 hours late and/or missing 1 or 2 and/or 3 or
more descriptor components

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion #4

Provide 3 specific examples of the actual changes you
would make by showing the original question and next to it the revised
question based upon the outcome of the student work, and justify with the
research why those changes would be appropriate.

4 pts

Level 4

Response provides 3 or more examples of the actual changes
you would make by showing the original question and next the revised question
based upon the outcome of the student work and justify with research why
those changes would be appropriate.

3.4 pts

Level 3

Response provides 2 examples of the actual changes you
would make by showing the original question and next the revised question
based upon the outcome of the student work and/or justify with research why
those changes would be appropriate.

3 pts

Level 2

Response provides 1 examples of the actual changes you
would make by showing the original question and next the revised question
based upon the outcome of the student work and/or justify with research why
those changes would be appropriate.

2 pts

Level 1

Missing 2 or more criteria as described in Level 2.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCriterion 5:
APA, Grammar and Spelling

2 pts

Level 4

0-2 errors in spelling and/or grammar and APA citations
were always used when needed

1.76 pts

Level 3

3-4 errors in spelling and/or grammar or APA citations
were used to back up most points

1.5 pts

Level 2

5-6 errors in spelling and/or grammar citations were used
but were not in APA format

1 pts

Level 1

6+ errors citations or were not used

2 pts

Total Points: 16