Researchers suggest a correlation between a teacher?s planning and students? success. Although lesson planning may seem laborious, students and teachers

Researchers suggest a correlation between a teacher’s planning and students’ success. Although lesson planning may seem laborious, students and teachers benefit from well-planned lessons and thoughtful preparation.

Using the “COE Lesson Plan Template,” develop a lesson based on the standard and objectives from your Topic 1 assignment. You may use other assignments in this course to support this lesson plan. Follow these specific guidelines when using the template:

In the “Multiple Means of Representation” section: Include materials and strategies that consider learning theories to help students make connections across the curriculum, curricular goals, and community.
In the “Multiple Means of Engagement” section: Include technology to engage students and support assessment practices.
In the “Multiple Means of Expression” section: Include strategies to prepare all students for assessment formats, including appropriate accommodations for students with disabilities.
In the “Homework and Extension” section: Explain strategies that include a student’s family and/or community to assist with developing a real-world connection to extend or reinforce students’ learning of the content.

Support your lesson plan with a minimum of three scholarly resources.

While APA style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

ESD-530Rubric-BenchmarkDifferentiationwithTechnologyLessonPlan.pdf

Benchmark – Differentiation with Technology Lesson Plan – Rubric

Multiple Means of Representation (B) 60 points

Criteria Description

Multiple Means of Representation (C5.8)

5. Target 60 points

Creatively presents content using a variety of developmentally appropriate

methods or tools. Thoughtfully includes materials and strategies that consider

learning theories to help students make connections across the curriculum,

curricular goals, and community as well as addressing the needs of diverse students

outlined in the COE Lesson Plan Template.

4. Acceptable 52.2 points

Presents content using a variety of developmentally appropriate methods or tools.

Includes relevant materials and strategies that consider learning theories to help

students make connections across the curriculum, curricular goals, and community

as well as addressing the needs of diverse students outlined in the COE Lesson Plan

Template.

3. Approaching 44.4 points

Presents content using methods or tools that are not developmentally appropriate.

Materials and strategies included do not take into consideration learning theories

to help students make connections across the curriculum, curricular goals, or

community and do not address the needs of diverse students outlined in the COE

Lesson Plan Template.

2. Insufficient 41.4 points

Ineffectively presents content using a variety of developmentally appropriate

methods or tools. Materials and strategies that consider learning theories to help

students make connections across the curriculum, curricular goals, and community

as well as addressing the needs of diverse students outlined in the COE Lesson Plan

Template are inappropriate or not included.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

https://www.gce.com/

Multiple Means of Engagement (B) 60 points

Criteria Description

Multiple Means of Engagement (C4.8)

5. Target 60 points

Innovatively uses technology to allow students to explore, practice, and apply the

content and academic language. Meaningfully addresses the needs of diverse

students outlined in the COE Lesson Plan Template.

4. Acceptable 52.2 points

Effectively uses technology to allow students to explore, practice, and apply the

content and academic language. Appropriately addresses the needs of diverse

students outlined in the COE Lesson Plan Template.

3. Approaching 44.4 points

Vaguely uses technology to allow students to explore, practice, and apply the

content and academic language. Does not fully address the needs of diverse

students outlined in the COE Lesson Plan Template.

2. Insufficient 41.4 points

Implausibly uses technology to allow students to explore, practice, and apply the

content and academic language. Inadequately addresses the needs of diverse

students outlined in the COE Lesson Plan Template.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Multiple Means of Expression (B) 60 points

Criteria Description

Multiple Means of Expression (C4.5)

5. Target 60 points

Planned formative and summative assessments are well-aligned to the stated

learning objectives and standards, and they effectively and creatively identify

multiple means for response, selection, and composition to accommodate all

students. Advanced strategies to prepare all students for assessment formats,

including appropriate accommodations in assessments or testing conditions for

students with disabilities are included.

4. Acceptable 52.2 points

Planned formative and summative assessments are generally aligned to the stated

learning objectives and standards, and they clearly identify multiple means for

response, selection, and composition to accommodate all students. Effective

strategies to prepare all students for assessment formats, including appropriate

accommodations in assessments or testing conditions for students with disabilities

are included.

3. Approaching 44.4 points

Planned formative and summative assessments are vaguely aligned to the stated

learning objectives and standards. Attempt to identify multiple means for response,

selection, and composition to accommodate all students is lacking depth. Strategies

included to prepare all students for assessment formats, including

accommodations in assessments or testing conditions for students with disabilities

are weak.

2. Insufficient 41.4 points

Planned formative and summative assessments are not clearly aligned to the stated

learning objectives and standards. They do not sufficiently identify multiple means

for response, selection, and composition to accommodate all students. Strategies

included to prepare all students for assessment formats, including

accommodations in assessments or testing conditions for students with disabilities

are inappropriate for students.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

Section 2: Extension Activity and/or Homework 60 points

Criteria Description

Section 2: Extension Activity and/or Homework

5. Target 60 points

Extension activities and/or homework creatively explains strategies that include a

students’ family and/or community to assist with developing a real-world

connection to extend or reinforce students’ learning of the content.

4. Acceptable 52.2 points

Extension activities and/or homework clearly explains strategies that include a

students’ family and/or community to assist with developing a real-world

connection to extend or reinforce students’ learning of the content.

3. Approaching 44.4 points

Extension activities and/or homework are unfocused, lacking realism, or do not

clearly explain strategies that include a students’ family and/or community to assist

with developing a real-world connection to extend or reinforce students’ learning of

the content.

2. Insufficient 41.4 points

Extension activities and/or homework are inappropriate or unrelated to the

developed lesson and/or do not include an explanation of strategies that include a

students’ family and/or community to assist with developing a real-world

connection to extend or reinforce students’ learning of the content.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

https://www.gce.com/

<a rel=’n

The post Researchers suggest a correlation between a teacher?s planning and students? success. Although lesson planning may seem laborious, students and teachers first appeared on Nursing Worker.

You are a former Navy officer and fighter pilot who is now the controller of a division of TransGlobal Airlines, which utilizes a fleet of corporate jets for charter at several airports in the southeast part of the United States. Your division’s private

Principles of Management Formative Assessment Brief 2025 | BPP Assessment Brief For this formative assignment you will produce a 1000-word management report on Ryanair

Use the “Case Study: Timothy Smith – Hospice/Palliative Care” template to complete the assignment. This case study has indirect care experience requirements. The “NRS-460 – Case Studies:

Personal Finance Basics Assessment Description The purpose of this assignment is to broaden your knowledge on how to manage your money, as this is an essential skill needed to survive college and life after college.

Explain the key components of micro- and macroeconomics theories and their impacts on organisational behaviour and the national economy 4. Examine leading theories of management, leadership and control and discuss t

The Code of Ethics and Evaluation Paper is a significant project for this course. The goal is to create an original code of ethics and evaluation paper for your company or organization. You may also choose to create a code of ethics for a fictitiou

Similar Posts