|
SMART Goal Evaluation Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Points
|
|
Content Reflection
|
Exemplary – 11-15 points
Reflection
demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and evaluating
key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions
activities, and/or assignments. Insightful and relevant connections made
through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples.
|
Accomplished – 6-10 points
Reflection
demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or
evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media,
discussions activities, and/or assignments. Connections made through
explanations, inferences, and/or examples.
|
Developing – 1-5 points
Reflection
demonstrates limited critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or
evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media,
discussions, activities, and/or assignments Minimal connections made through
explanations, inferences, and/or examples.
|
Unsatisfactory – 0 points
Reflection lacks
critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts
and course materials, activities, and/or assignments.
|
15 points
|
|
Personal Growth
|
Exemplary – 16-20 points
Conveys strong
evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the
self-assessment questions posed. Demonstrates significant personal growth and
awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made, examples, well developed
insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges. Synthesizes
current experience into future implications.
|
Accomplished – 11-15 points
Conveys evidence of
reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment
questions posed. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness
through some inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges. Some
thought of the future implications of current experience.
|
Developing – 1-10 points
Conveys limited
evidence of reflection on own work in response to the self-assessment
questions posed. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and
awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, examples, insights,
and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of the future
implications of current experience.
|
Unsatisfactory – 0 points
Conveys inadequate
evidence of reflection on own work in response to the self-assessment
questions posed. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrates
a neutral experience with negligible personal impact. Lacks enough
inferences, examples, personal insights and challenges, and/or future
implications are overlooked.
|
20 points
|
|
Word Document and Video Presentation
|
Exemplary – 8-10 points
All sections of the
assignment are completed fully and described in the word document in great
detail. The word document is 750-1000 words in length. Video presentation is
between 5 and 7 minutes. Well spoken, professional and clearly organized
using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong oral
presentation delivery, e.g., good eye contact, clear audible voice, posed,
controlled and smooth delivery with good language skills and pronunciation
for > 75% of the time. Seemed to read from notes <25% of the time.
|
Accomplished – 6-7 points
At least 75% of the
assignment is completed and described in the document with some detail. The
word document is 750-1000 words in length. Video presentation is between 5
and 7 minutes. Above average oral presentation delivery and logically
organized using standard English with minor errors e.g., good eye contact,
clear audible voice, posed, controlled and smooth delivery with good language
skills and pronunciation for > 50 and <75%% of the time. Seemed to read
from notes >50% of the time..
|
Developing – 1-5 points
The word document
contains at least 50% of the assignment. However, the document does not
contain detailed examples. The word document is 749-500 words in length.
Video presentation is between 5 and 7 minutes. Average and/or casual oral
presentation delivery that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in
grammar, e.g., good eye contact, clear audible voice, posed, controlled and
smooth delivery with good language skills and pronunciation for > 25% and
<50% of the time. Seemed to read from notes <50% of the time.
|
Unsatisfactory – 0 points
The word document
contains less than 50% of the required content. the word document is less
than 500 words in length. Did not create video presentation and/or is less
than 5 minutes long or more than 8 minutes long. Seemed to read from notes
>50% of the time.
|
10 points
|
|
Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics
and APA Formatting Guidelines
|
Exemplary – 5 points
The reference page
contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text
reference. Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font,
abstract, level headings, hanging indent and in-text citations. Rules of
grammar, usage and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
|
Accomplished – 3 points
References page
contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows
most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level
headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations. Few grammatical errors, but
sentences could be clearer and more precise.
|
Developing – 2 points
References page
contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Many errors of
APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent,
and in-text citations. Presentation contains few grammatical, punctuation and
spelling errors.
|
Unsatisfactory – 0 points
References page
contains no current scholarly academic resources, only internet webpages or
no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references provided or in-text
citations. Presentation contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and
spelling errors.
|
5 points
|
|
Total Points
|
50
|
