In preparation for your Unit 1 written submission about contemporary issues in forensic psychology, we will explore a range of contemporary issues involving forensic psychology. The more we discuss these contemporary issues, the better equipped everyone will be to complete the written submission.
Choose any two of the following contemporary issues share your thoughts and reflections:
Interrogations and Confessions
Polygraphs
Involuntary Civil Commitment
Competency Restoration
Implicit Bias and Criminal Justice
Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification
Solitary Confinement
Trauma and Memory
Eyewitness Testimony
Describe two current examples that illustrate key factors impacting the contemporary issue.
Describe an example of someone who is working to reduce negative aspects (consequences?).
In your replies to other classmates, ask probing questions to dig deeper and consider differing viewpoints.
Discussion Board Reminders:
Must have three posts: A Main Post and two replies to peers.
First post: Either your main post or a reply to others must be posted before midnight CT (Central time) on Friday of each week.
Second and third post: Must be posted on a different day from the first post.
Connect to Content: At least one post must refer to course learning materials. See the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards for help with connecting to the content.
Engaging in Class Discussions: For more information on making the most of your class dialog, review the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards.
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria Proficient Descriptor Points
Quality of Main Post
30 Points
Total
Student’s main post meets or exceeds the following requirements:
Responds completely to all of parts of discussion question (7.5 points)
Communicates content information accurately and/or logically (7.5 points)
Delivers a thoughtful response demonstrating insights and reflections (7.5 points)
Connects to key content concepts and personal experiences (if applicable) (7.5 points)
/30 pts.
Response to Peers
27 Points
Total
Responds to a minimum of two peers (13.5 points per response):
Substantive response (7 points)
Furthers the conversation with peers. Examples could include (6.5 points):
Provides additional resources
Connects accurately to key concepts
Shares personal or professional experiences
Contributes new information or perspective
Presents a competing viewpoint
/27 pts.
Support from Learning Resources
9 Points
Total
At least one post references course resources or library resources. /9 pts.
Professional Writing
9 points
Response is well-organized, clear, and free of grammatical and mechanical errors.
Posts demonstrate courtesy and respect for others.
