Limited time offer

Get 25% off your order

Use the code below at checkout — offer expires soon.

Your promo codeBESTW25
25%
Expires in: 10:00
Claim my 25% discount
💬 Request a Quote, It's FREE!!!

🎓 Get 20% off your first order! Use code FIRST20 at checkout. Order Now →

Home Uncategorized Healthcare Policy and Analysis Policy What are legislators currently doing to address your selected advocacy priorities for a vulnerable population? Are there current policies in place? Are there current policies

Healthcare Policy and Analysis Policy What are legislators currently doing to address your selected advocacy priorities for a vulnerable population? Are there current policies in place? Are there current policies

Subject Uncategorized
Delivery From 3 Hours
Quality 100% Original
Status ✓ Available

Healthcare Policy and Analysis

Policy

What are legislators currently doing to address your selected advocacy priorities for a vulnerable population? Are there current policies in place? Are there current policies proposed at either the state or federal level? What are the most obvious strengths and weaknesses of these policies as they relate to your advocacy priority? What might need to change?

For this Discussion, you will identify a state or federal policy that aligns with your advocacy priority. After identifying the policy, you will consider how the policy aligns and supports your identified vulnerable population. How and why does this policy align with your advocacy priorities?

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Resources

Readings

  • Dawes, D. E. (2020). The political determinants of health. Johns Hopkins University Press.
    • Chapter 5, “Wining the Game That Never Ends: Success Means Continuous Employment of the Political Determinants of Health” (pp. 112–130)
  • Porche, D. J. (2023). Health policy: Applications for nurses and other healthcare professionals (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    • Chapter 12, “Evidence Informing Policymaking ” (pp. 175–183)
    • Chapter 15, “Politics: Theory and Practice” (pp. 201–237)
  • Document: Personal Legislative Agenda and Action Plan Exemplar (Word Document)Download Personal Legislative Agenda and Action Plan Exemplar (Word Document)
  • Association of Public Health Nurses Public Health Policy Committee. (2021). Public health policy advocacy guidebook and tool kitLinks to an external site.. https://www.phnurse.org/assets/docs/APHN%20Public%20Health%20Policy%20Advocacy%20Guidebook%20and%20Toolkit%20_May%202021.pdf
  • Congress.govLinks to an external site.. (2022). https://www.congress.gov/
  • Congress.gov. (2022). State legislative websitesLinks to an external site. [Interactive media]. https://www.congress.gov/state-legislature-websites
  • Gustafson, A. (2017, December 12). How to be a political influence—as an average citizen. CurrentsLinks to an external site.. https://smea.uw.edu/currents/how-to-be-a-political-influence-as-an-average-citizen/
  • Rees, A. (2013, August 6). Digital and online activismLinks to an external site.. Reset: Digital for Good. https://en.reset.org/digital-and-online-activism/
  • Social Current. (n.d.). Policy, advocacy, and communications toolkitLinks to an external site.. https://alliance1.org/web/resources/pubs/policy-advocacy-communications-toolkit.aspx 
  • White, N. (2018). Introduction: Why read the Effective Activist Guide. In Effective activist: An evidence-based guide to progressive social changeLinks to an external site. (pp. 6–10). Effective Activist. https://effectiveactivist.com/intro/



To Prepare:

  • Review resources related to health policy.
  • Consider the health policy that might align with your advocacy priorities.
  • Post a response detailing the following:
  • Identify a proposed state and federal policy that aligns with your advocacy priorities for your vulnerable population. Clearly describe and provide evidence to support this policy. If the policy needs to change, describe and provide evidence to support the proposed change.
  • Assignment Rubric DetailsClose
  • Rubric
  • NURS_8100_Week5-7_Discussion1_Rubric

NURS_8100_Week5-7_Discussion1_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRESPONSIVENESS TO DISCUSSION QUESTION (20 possible points) Discussion post minimum requirements: The original posting must be completed by Day 3 at 10:59 pm CT. Two response postings to two different peer original posts, on two different days, are required by Day 6 at 10:59 pm CT. Faculty member inquiries require responses, which are not included in the peer posts. Your Discussion Board postings should be written in Standard Academic English and follow APA 7 style for format and grammar as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support the postings with specific citations from this week's learning resources as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.)

20 to >19.0 pts

Excellent

Discussion postings and responses are responsive to and exceed the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the question/s being asked or the prompt/s provided. Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., the post contributes a new dimension, unearths something unanticipated) • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Exceeds the minimum requirements for discussion posts.

19 to >15.0 pts

Good

Discussion postings and responses are responsive to and meet the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the question/s being asked or the prompt/s provided. • Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Meets the minimum requirements for discussion posts.

15 to >12.0 pts

Fair

Discussion postings and responses are somewhat responsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student may not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question/s or prompt/s. • Minimally demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Does not meet the minimum requirements for discussion posts; has not posted by the due date at least in part.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

Discussion postings and responses are unresponsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • Does not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question/s or prompt/s. • Does not demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered a variety of learning resources, as well as resources available through the Walden University library and other credible online resources (guidelines, expert opinions etc.) • Does not meet the requirements for discussion posts; has not posted by the due date and did not discuss late post timing with faculty.


			</p>
		</td>
		<td width="40" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in">
			<font face="Times New Roman, serif">20&nbsp;pts</font></p>
		</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td width="180" height="464" valign="top" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in">
			<font face="Times New Roman, serif">This criterion is linked to a
			Learning OutcomeCONTENT REFLECTION and MASTERY: Initial Post (30
			possible points)</font></p>
		</td>
		<td width="478" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0in">
			<table width="543" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0">
				<colgroup><col width="138">
				<col width="131">
				<col width="132">
				<col width="84">
				</colgroup><tbody><tr valign="top">
					<td width="138" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>30&nbsp;to
						&gt;29.0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Excellent</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Initial
						Discussion posting: • Post demonstrates mastery and
						thoughtful/accurate application of content and/or strategies
						presented in the course. • Posts are substantive and
						reflective, with critical analysis and synthesis
						representative of knowledge gained from the course readings
						and current credible evidence. • Initial post is supported
						by 3 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a
						variety of scholarly sources including course and outside
						readings.</font></font></p>
					</td>
					<td width="131" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>29&nbsp;to
						&gt;23.0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Good</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Initial
						Discussion posting: • Posts demonstrate some mastery and
						application of content, applicable skills, or strategies
						presented in the course. • Posts are substantive and
						reflective, with analysis and synthesis representative of
						knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible
						evidence. • Initial post is supported by 3 or more relevant
						examples and research/evidence from a variety of scholarly
						sources including course and outside readings.</font></font></p>
					</td>
					<td width="132" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>23&nbsp;to
						&gt;18.0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Fair</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Initial
						Discussion posting: • Post may lack in depth, reflection,
						analysis, or synthesis but rely more on anecdotal than
						scholarly evidence. • Posts demonstrate minimal
						understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course,
						and, although generally accurate, display some omissions
						and/or errors. • There is a lack of support from relevant
						scholarly research/evidence.</font></font></p>
					</td>
					<td width="84" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>18&nbsp;to
						&gt;0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Poor</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Initial
						Discussion posting: • Post lacks in substance, reflection,
						analysis, or synthesis. • Posts do not generalize, extend
						thinking or evaluate concepts and issues within the topic or
						context of the discussion. • Relevant examples and scholarly
						resources are not provided.</font></font></p>
					</td>
				</tr>
			</tbody></table>
			<p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in"><br>

			</p>
		</td>
		<td width="40" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in">
			<font face="Times New Roman, serif">30&nbsp;pts</font></p>
		</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td width="180" height="589" valign="top" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in">
			<font face="Times New Roman, serif">This criterion is linked to a
			Learning OutcomeCONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION: First Response
			(20 possible points)</font></p>
		</td>
		<td width="478" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0in">
			<table width="544" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0">
				<colgroup><col width="121">
				<col width="122">
				<col width="122">
				<col width="121">
				</colgroup><tbody><tr valign="top">
					<td width="121" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>20&nbsp;to
						&gt;19.0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Excellent</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Discussion
						response: • Significantly contributes to the quality of the
						discussion/interaction and thinking and learning. • Provides
						rich and relevant examples and thought-provoking ideas that
						demonstrates new perspectives, and synthesis of ideas
						supported by the literature. • Scholarly sources are
						correctly cited and formatted. • First response is supported
						by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence from a
						variety of scholarly sources including course and outside
						readings. • Responds to questions posed by faculty.</font></font></p>
					</td>
					<td width="122" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>19&nbsp;to
						&gt;15.0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Good</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Discussion
						response: • Contributes to the quality of the
						interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides relevant
						examples and/or thought-provoking ideas • Scholarly sources
						are correctly cited and formatted. • First response is
						supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence
						from a variety of scholarly sources including course and
						outside readings. • Responds to questions posed by faculty.</font></font></p>
					</td>
					<td width="122" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>15&nbsp;to
						&gt;12.0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Fair</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Discussion
						response: • Minimally contributes to the quality of the
						interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides few examples
						to support thoughts. • Information provided lacks evidence
						of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas. • There is a
						lack of support from relevant scholarly research/evidence. •
						No response to questions posed by faculty.</font></font></p>
					</td>
					<td width="121" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>12&nbsp;to
						&gt;0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Poor</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Discussion
						response: • Does not contribute to the quality of the
						interaction/discussion and learning. • Lacks relevant
						examples or ideas. • There is a lack of support from
						relevant scholarly research/evidence. • No response to
						questions posed by faculty.</font></font></p>
					</td>
				</tr>
			</tbody></table>
			<p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in"><br>

			</p>
		</td>
		<td width="40" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in">
			<font face="Times New Roman, serif">20&nbsp;pts</font></p>
		</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td width="180" height="589" valign="top" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in">
			<font face="Times New Roman, serif">This criterion is linked to a
			Learning OutcomeCONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION: Second Response
			(20 possible points)</font></p>
		</td>
		<td width="478" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0in">
			<table width="544" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0">
				<colgroup><col width="121">
				<col width="122">
				<col width="122">
				<col width="121">
				</colgroup><tbody><tr valign="top">
					<td width="121" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>20&nbsp;to
						&gt;19.0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Excellent</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Discussion
						response: • Significantly contributes to the quality of the
						discussion/interaction and thinking and learning. • Provides
						relevant examples and thought-provoking ideas that
						demonstrates new perspectives, and extensive synthesis of
						ideas supported by the literature. • Second response is
						supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence
						from a variety of scholarly sources including course and
						outside readings. • Scholarly sources are correctly cited
						and formatted. • Responds to questions posed by faculty.</font></font></p>
					</td>
					<td width="122" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>19&nbsp;to
						&gt;15.0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Good</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Discussion
						response: • Contributes to the quality of the
						interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides relevant
						examples and/or thought-provoking ideas • Second response is
						supported by 2 or more relevant examples and research/evidence
						from a variety of scholarly sources including course and
						outside readings. • Scholarly sources are correctly cited
						and formatted. • Responds to questions posed by faculty.</font></font></p>
					</td>
					<td width="122" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>15&nbsp;to
						&gt;12.0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Fair</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Discussion
						response: • Minimally contributes to the quality of the
						interaction/discussion and learning. • Provides few examples
						to support thoughts. • Information provided lacks evidence
						of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas. • Minimal
						scholarly sources provided to support post. • Does not
						respond to questions posed by faculty.</font></font></p>
					</td>
					<td width="121" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>12&nbsp;to
						&gt;0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Poor</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Discussion
						response: • Does not contribute to the quality of the
						interaction/discussion and learning. • Lacks relevant
						examples or ideas. • No sources provided. • Does not
						respond to questions posed by faculty.</font></font></p>
					</td>
				</tr>
			</tbody></table>
			<p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in"><br>

			</p>
		</td>
		<td width="40" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in">
			<font face="Times New Roman, serif">20&nbsp;pts</font></p>
		</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td width="180" height="499" valign="top" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in">
			<font face="Times New Roman, serif">This criterion is linked to a
			Learning OutcomeQUALITY OF WRITING (10 possible points)</font></p>
		</td>
		<td width="478" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0in">
			<table width="543" cellpadding="7" cellspacing="0">
				<colgroup><col width="122">
				<col width="123">
				<col width="121">
				<col width="119">
				</colgroup><tbody><tr valign="top">
					<td width="122" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>10&nbsp;to
						&gt;9.0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Excellent</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Discussion
						postings and responses exceed doctoral level writing
						expectations: • Use Standard Academic English that is clear,
						concise, and appropriate to doctoral level writing. • Make
						few if any errors in spelling, grammar, that does not affect
						clear communication. • Uses correct APA 7 format as closely
						as possible given the constraints of the online platform. •
						Are positive, courteous, and respectful when offering
						suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints.</font></font></p>
					</td>
					<td width="123" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>9&nbsp;to
						&gt;8.0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Good</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Discussion
						postings and responses meet doctoral level writing
						expectations: • Use Standard Academic English that is clear
						and appropriate to doctoral level writing • Makes a few
						errors in spelling, grammar, that does not affect clear
						communication. • Uses correct APA 7 format as closely as
						possible given the constraints of the online platform. • Are
						courteous and respectful when offering suggestions,
						constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints.</font></font></p>
					</td>
					<td width="121" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>8&nbsp;to
						&gt;6.0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Fair</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Discussion
						postings and responses are somewhat below doctoral level
						writing expectations: • Posts contains multiple spelling,
						grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic
						English that affect clear communication. • Numerous errors
						in APA 7 format • May be less than courteous and respectful
						when offering suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.</font></font></p>
					</td>
					<td width="119" style="border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-bottom: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-left: 1px solid #aaaaaa;border-right: 1px solid #aaaaaa;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
						<font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>6&nbsp;to
						&gt;0&nbsp;pts</b></font></font></p>
						<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt"><b>Poor</b></font></font></p>
						<p><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="2" style="font-size: 10pt">Discussion
						postings and responses are well below doctoral level writing
						expectations: • Posts contains multiple spelling, grammar,
						and/or punctuation deviations from Standard Academic English
						that affect clear communication. • Uses incorrect APA 7
						format • Are discourteous and disrespectful when offering
						suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.</font></font></p>
					</td>
				</tr>
			</tbody></table>
			<p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in"><br>

			</p>
		</td>
		<td width="40" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in">
			<font face="Times New Roman, serif">10&nbsp;pts</font></p>
		</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td colspan="3" width="727" style="border: 1px solid #c7cdd1;padding: 0.07in 0.1in"><p style="line-height: 100%;margin-bottom: 0in">
			<font face="Times New Roman, serif">Total Points:&nbsp;100</font></p>
		</td>
	</tr>
</tbody>

📝 Need Help With a Similar Assignment?

Our expert writers can deliver a 100% original, plagiarism-free paper tailored to your requirements with fast turnaround.

Get Professional Help Now →
WhatsApp
Limited Offer Get 25% off — use code BESTW25
No AI No Plagiarism On-Time Delivery Free Revisions
Claim Now